Judging Policy
Deadly Funny Judging Policy
The Judges’ Objective
The overriding aim of Deadly Funny is to uncover and support new First Nations performers with the potential to make a sincere contribution to the artform and the industry, in the years ahead.
Some entrants will have had more stage time than others and therefore will be better ‘performers’, but we aren’t concerned if they are a little nervous or they forget the next line. Who looks like they could have a career in comedy? Who could be a possible star of the future? Who could go on to present new, innovative and exciting comedy in the years to come?
Who are the judges? What are they looking for?
The judges include industry, performers, media, and other local identities.
There is no formal, structured way of “marking” or “scoring”. Judges are instructed to identify performers with potential for creative achievement.
Some of the things they look out for are quality and originality of material, performance skills and audience response.
The judging pro-forma
The judging pro-forma is part of the judging process. It makes some specific notes on what judges look for. Judges don’t rely on precise numerical scores; they make qualitative notes, for discussion amongst themselves, considering each act in the context of the whole night they’ve just seen, to pick a “winner”.
Judging comedy is really subjective
The Comedy Festival, judges, contestants and audiences need to recognise that no creative endeavour can be precisely “measured” to be “best”. Judges make a subjective – although final – decision informed by their own experiences in the artform and industry.
Deal-breakers: what’s absolutely not on
- Doing material that the contestant didn’t write.
- Material that is racist, sexist, homophobic or otherwise seriously offends the sensibilities of the audience.
Complaints and queries
Judges will only discuss their decisions with the responsible Comedy Festival staff members or representatives. Deadly Funny contestants and audiences are invited to contact the Comedy Festival office to discuss judges’ decisions. It is not appropriate to enter into discussion with judges themselves at a heat, where they have so generously volunteered their time.